OF SMALL IS THE KINGDOM. HAPPY!
JUST GET ME THE ITEM JOSÉ IGNACIO Glez FAUS written for the September 23 against trafficking humanos.NO permitted to pass. I think his word is authoritative. And Jesus even more!
M Luisa
took ten years working in this journal. I thought several times in an article like today, but feared he would not publish it or I appreciated the services rendered. And here the issue is now beginning to break the shell of silence that was locked ...
The Sept. 23 marks the day against human trafficking humans. For this reason I am writing today to all the press that, when writing his books, never cease to proclaim high ethical standards (though usually tolerate criticism even less than the holy mother church.) I want to make a request almost desperate, for all newspapers to stop running ads for prostitution, disguised under euphemisms of meetings, contacts and more.
Trafficking in women is one of the most ominous slavery of our time . The prostitute of today is not the century Manon Lescaut XVIII, or even Dostoevsky's Sonia XIX. According to the testimony of Iñaki Gabilondo, a TV news 4, over 90% of women in prostitution in our country do to force. Half of them are authentic slaves brought from outside tricked, abducted and forced undocumented also to pay an alleged debt owed by the passage to Spain. Other finished and because of unemployment or the need to send money to family in Nigeria and Colombia. His day "work" is strenuous, exposed to a thousand humiliations of customers, in essence, they hate themselves, and getting AIDS on a whim or convenience of paying. Below the picture that hints at a smile breasts or real beat floods of tears, and move deeper as a cruel and powerful mafias as drug trafficking. We can defend sexual freedom, but contribute to sexual slavery in the name of sexual freedom is pure hypocrisy. And ads that say: "Fifteen young delicious price crisis" degrades the dignity of women and who published this ad.
However, both the world of liberals like the old morality tend a prudish veil over this drama. We campaign against a burka extemporaneous absurd but very minor, and do not move a finger to prevent having to remove clothing countless poor creatures that are not owned by a sexist and jealous husband but a tyrannical and greedy mob. We horror figures of domestic violence, but silent on this other equally sexist violence. Pages and pages dedicated to World Cup: if it hurts this or that muscle to one of our idols for the next match point, but not a word about the forced transportation of women to South Africa to relax millionaire players and fans crazy exhausted by the effort. Fortunately, the minister of equality seems to be at last! seized of the matter, very late but better late than ever. And speaking of delay because this is a more urgent problem than abortion (which she thought "and overcome") and spend more urgent than in the economic crisis, several thousand euros for a study on female sexual stimulation (or is that it did so to entertain the women who have to spend less during the crisis ?)...
should be clear that I'm not talking in general or not to legalize prostitution. This is another broader issue. now is only a part of him that terrorism is a real vested interests. calculate how many losses do not know for daily newspapers would waive these ads: they say that more than suspect. Well, I'm willing to give up the modest contribution I perceive through my articles, if it can alleviate some ... I also know that removing these ads will not solve the problem of trafficking in women, but I think it would enhance our dignity. And if not, I dare to ask any director or shareholder of a newspaper which would if one of those ads were his own daughter.
I recently saw a wonderful girl from a secular institution that is dedicated, among other things, to help these women. He told me who had come up very close to where we were mentioned, accompanied by a girl from his neighborhood that would make the roads. "You're going to see a friend and I'm going to do bitch," he said at parting. And tell me it appeared a tear to the eye, although both and as much as has seen. When we left we said that there was a "religious leader" which both try to follow, which deserves the highest praise and most admired if only for saying simply: " prostitutes go to the kingdom of heaven before you all" (Mt 21.31).
And ended with this sentence: because adding something would spoil it.
0 comments:
Post a Comment